Foot in baby's brain

This post is graphic, but interesting. Doctors in Colorado removed a developing leg, hand, and intestine from a baby's brain. The news story is here and a big graphic picture here. The good news is the baby seems to be recovering well from the surgery. Although I don't agree with him completely, PZ Meyers had thoughts similar to mine on the matter:

Something struck me when I saw the photograph of this particular surgery. Here it is, a photo of a fetal foot flopping out of a bloody baby's brain (don't click if you're squeamish). As I'm sure you've noticed, anti-choice people love to parade about with gory photos of aborted fetuses, and they love to dwell on little details like a recognizable hand or face. This picture is exactly like those, yet realize this: there was no human being behind those little baby toes. The existence of these fragments of non-sentient tissue endangered the life of a child, and there was no question that they needed to be extracted.

This is also how we should view abortion. It's ugly and messy, and there's something disquietingly resonant of humanity in the pieces of the embryo or fetus, but we shouldn't be fooled. Those are beautifully patterned collections of differentiated cells, but there is no person there.

Now it is unknown if these organs were a growth from the baby that was born born or another fetus developing inside the baby that was born, but it provides interesting grist for really interesting scientific and ethical thought. I would ask PZ, "when is there a 'person' there?" I don't have the answer, but I definitely think it is interesting to think what makes us human (not that I think that makes us as a species 'special', just different). I am confident there will not be a definitive answer in my life time, if ever.